This kind of question is built on the assumption that all money earned is earned fairly and justly, and that all money taxed is both unfair and unjust.
Here's the thing though, that idea of private property we take for granted as the foundation of just about everything? Perhaps we shouldn't take it for granted.
What do I mean by that? Well, I'm not suggesting the idea that private property shouldn't exist or that it shouldn't be enforced. I am suggesting that by enforcing it as we do, we create a situation that wouldn't exist naturally, and therefore perhaps ethically requires that we compensate for our creation and enforcement of it in some way.
Think of it this way. 3... 2... 1... I now own everything.
This is fair, because I called dibs, just like our ancestors did long ago. Because I now control access to all resources on Earth, you are no longer allowed to live on it without my permission. Oh sure, if I didn't own everything, you could just pick an apple off a tree, or plant some vegetables, or hunt some deer, or even eat food out of trash cans, but too bad. I own everything. It is all my property.
You are not allowed to live without my permission.
In order to live, you will need to prove your worth to me. Don't worry, as long as you pull your weight (according to my judgment), I will give you enough access to my resources to survive.
What's that? It's not fair that I own everything? But I called dibs. That's totally fair.
What's that? I didn't create the planet so why should I own it? I should only own the added improvements I make using the natural resources no one made?
Hmmm, actually, that's a good point. I suppose we should adjust our rules to acknowledge that shouldn't we?
If you build a chair out of a tree, until that moment in time that tree was available to everyone el...