This is my response to the “responsible disclosure” of would-be neutral scientists that are destroying the reputation of IOTA, but also of the MIT (media lab), the Boston University (one associated developer), and Forbes.
In these times, fake-news and tinfoil stories can be found everywhere. The following post could be just a big coincidence, but if we allow ourselves in connecting some dots, maybe we get a better picture of “cryptoland”.
I’ll say it upfront: Competing projects try to harm IOTA as much as possible.
Let me start with this tweet of “fnord” because this pretty much sums up my motivation to write this summary.No, cryptographers looking at it is awesome. Writing a hit piece and going around bragging about how the price tanked afterwards not so much — fnord (@fnord2) September 12, 2017
On this blog, I usually try to stick to straight facts and relevant, legit news about IOTA. No Bells and whistles, Just information.
We also expect straight facts and objective information when we visit pages like Forbes or when we read peer-reviews from MIT and BU scientists, but apparently, this is not the case.
Therefore, I decided to leave the path of tech news around IOTA for a moment, in order to draw a picture of how competition in this sphere works.
Recently we witnessed a misinformation campaign of highest magnitude in order to harm IOTA’s reputation. And I’m going to explain why.
It is vital to understand that some innovators in this innovative field of cryptocurrencies act in their own best interest. As rational deciding hom...